|
Post by Chubby - FACT: Cooler than you on Jun 29, 2009 21:21:11 GMT -5
I had yet to catch on today, that the british word b*llocks is a very explicit and vulgar term! Had I known that three days ago, I wouldn't have yelled it about all day thinking it was funny!
|
|
|
Post by Dominick on Jun 29, 2009 21:45:13 GMT -5
They said it on Lost once.
|
|
|
Post by Chubby - FACT: Cooler than you on Jun 29, 2009 21:49:38 GMT -5
I know, and I remember that, but whenever I see it written down, it's always censored, and it's apperently equally as bad, or close enough to being as rude as the C word...
|
|
|
Post by Dominick on Jun 29, 2009 23:27:32 GMT -5
Seriously?
|
|
|
Post by Chubby - FACT: Cooler than you on Jun 29, 2009 23:35:25 GMT -5
The C word thing I'm not sure about, but it is censored when I see it written down/ in text. I don't get it, really. If you can say it on TV like LOST did, than why can't you say stuff like "shit" or "fuck"?
|
|
|
Post by Dominick on Jun 29, 2009 23:39:57 GMT -5
You can't say those words?
|
|
|
Post by Chubby - FACT: Cooler than you on Jun 30, 2009 0:39:39 GMT -5
It's supposed to be sh*t and f*ck, RU has censors on them, as do all other TV stations. I just don't see how B*llocks is offensive... it isn't a racial slur, or a known swear word but according to various sites such as www.statisticsworld.com www.wikipedia.org and iTunes, it's pretty bad
|
|
|
Post by Dominick on Jun 30, 2009 1:08:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Chubby - FACT: Cooler than you on Jun 30, 2009 1:25:05 GMT -5
Hmmm.. okay, it makes sense, but as you said, it was said in LOST which means it can't be half as bad as the f or c word.
|
|
|
Post by Dominick on Jun 30, 2009 1:31:09 GMT -5
In England it is.
|
|
|
Post by Chubby - FACT: Cooler than you on Jun 30, 2009 3:30:23 GMT -5
Good lord, how would I miss that! Nice one.
|
|
|
Post by Tom on Jun 30, 2009 4:50:30 GMT -5
I really dont understand why these words are bad? Who decided they were? When was this decided? Why the fuck wasn't I told about it? Ah..
|
|